by Jeff Davis
Only weeks after Newsweek magazine produced its last printed issue, its liberal sister publication, Time magazine is increasingly on life supports. An article from Business Insider reports: “Time Warner’s Time Inc. will lay off up to 700 staffers out of just under 8,000 total as the publisher’s new chief struggles to transform famous titles and massive market share into a digital profit center. The staff cuts will come sometime in the first quarter, said a person familiar with the company’s plans, and will be across the board — not just focused on editorial, where staffing has already been hard hit. A Time Warner spokesman declined comment.”
It’s ironic that the same liberal system which has turned America into a multi-racial nation of illiterates is now reaping what it has sown. It’s not just the unpopularity of liberal drivel any more, but many brown and black public schools drop outs lack the literacy to read their magazine.
The article goes on: “Time Inc. revenue fell 6% for the nine months ended in September to $2.5 billion. Profit dropped 14% to $220 million. During that period, it dominated 21.5% of overall domestic magazine advertising. Time’s stable of 21 U.S. magazines and 25 websites includes Time, In Style, Fortune, People, Entertainment Weekly, Sports Illustrated and Real Simple. It has over 100 titles worldwide.”
“For the third quarter, subscription revenue dipped 6% and advertising revenue eased 5%, echoing trends across the traditional publishing world as consumers digest information in new ways. Digital advertising and expanding readership on tablets and other mobile devices hasn’t made up for losses elsewhere. Given the new face of publishing, Time Warner settled in late 2011 on Laura Lang, CEO of digital marketing agency Digitas, to run the business. She started just over a year ago.”
The fluff magazines will probably last for a while, but Time magazine itself will probably disappear within a year or two. And good riddance. We get one less dose of poisonous liberal drivel every week.
The New York Times may go extinct soon as well. Liberal magazines and rags have been failing one-by-one. Why pay for some anti-White liberal editorials, when you can go online and read conservative and pro-White articles for free?
by Charles Coughlin
Anyone familiar with the real Martin Luther King Jr. knows a man far removed from the patron “saint” of liberalism that he has become today. Every January 15th, we hear excerpts from his speeches and we are told how “great” he was. Invariably quotes from King’s “I have a dream speech” are played. In the most important line in that speech, King proclaimed that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the “color of their skin.” Let’s dissect that speech and determine if King really was a “great man” or if his very words make him a hypocrite and a phony.
If King truly wanted people judged by the content of their character, then why didn’t he urge the government and universities to create completely color-blind tests for jobs and admission policies for higher education?? This is exactly the sort of policy that would result from King’s most famous speech if taken literally —and if King were telling the truth. If King, the liberals and the liberal media truly wanted equality of opportunity, this could have been achieved almost overnight by requiring a written exam for each job and giving the job to the person with the highest score.
There is however a little stumbling block that King and the liberals never mentioned. The races are not equal. Blacks have a smaller brain size on average than Whites. Blacks score on average 15 percent lower on IQ tests than Whites and this discrepancy has not changed despite several generations of testing. The real reason why Whites do better in school and get better paying jobs is that Whites are more intelligent than Blacks. Canadian Professor J. Phillippe Rushton has devoted much of his academic career to studying racial differences and his work can be found here.
The reason why color blind tests were not “enough” was that the liberals and corrupt politicians wanted to TAKE JOBS away from White people and give them to less-deserving Blacks as a sort of collective punishment. It didn’t matter if Joe Lindbergh’s parents came straight off the boat from Sweden and never discriminated against a Black. Joe’s job had to be handed over to Tyrone Johnson as a form of collective punishment. Period. That’s liberal “justice” or “Affirmative Action.”
It also doesn’t matter if Tyrone’s parents and grandparents were never discriminated against. Tyrone’s immediate relatives could have gotten every job they deserved to get and it would make no difference. According to liberals, the Black had to be unfairly rewarded and the White had to be unfairly punished. Racial quota systems on both the state and federal levels were established to ensure that anti-White discrimination would become the law of the land.
Curiously, the discrimination against Blacks was NEVER as widespread or evil as the modern day (and ongoing) discrimination against Whites. Most of the so-called “discrimination” against Blacks was merely racial separation designed to keep the races a safe distance apart so that White people would not fall victim to the frequent and spontaneous acts of violence that many Blacks commit. The total number of Blacks in America who were unfairly denied employment and who were actually better qualified for a job than any of the White applicants in the 1950s and ’60s would probably fit inside a high school auditorium. Because of this tiny number of incidents, the liberals created a system of anti-White “reverse discrimination.” The number of Whites who have had jobs unfairly stolen from them over the last forty years amounts to tens of millions of acts of DISCRIMINATION BY RACE.
Only in the mind of a sick, twisted self-hating liberal is it “OK” to punish tens of millions of innocent White people to compensate for a few hundred acts of discrimination against Blacks.
Martin Luther King Jr. did NOT want equal opportunity for jobs; he wanted unfair advantages for HIS people based on their RACE. The Civil Rights Movement did not end with “The Civil Rights Act of 1964.” The Blacks did not stop marching and rioting until they got racial quotas to give their people high-paying jobs that rightfully belonged to more intelligent, better qualified Whites. Most people understand that two wrongs don’t make a right, but in the liberal world ten million wrongs make a right.
by James Buchanan
Liberalism is all about a lack of responsibility for one’s actions. The biggest responsibility of all in this world is to raise your children and to do it right so that one day they become responsible parents themselves.
Both the US and Europe have created programs where mothers with new born babies can drop those babies off with no questions asked. One of the reasons for this program was that some mothers would actually drop their infants into garbage cans right after giving birth. In the US babies are dropped off at fire stations. A Daily News article mentions two babies dropped off in the last week.
The U.K. Guardian reports: “The United Nations is increasingly concerned at the spread in Europe of ‘baby boxes’ where infants can be secretly abandoned by parents, warning that the practice contravenes the right of the child to be known and cared for by his or her parents, the Guardian has learned.”
“The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, which reports on how well governments respect and protect children’s human rights, is alarmed at the prevalence of the hatches – usually outside a hospital – which allow unwanted newborns to be left in boxes with an alarm or bell to summon a carer.”
“The committee, a group of 18 international human rights experts based in Geneva, says that while foundling wheels and baby hatches had disappeared from Europe in the last century, almost 200 have been installed across the continent in the past decade in nations as diverse as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Poland, Czech Republic and Latvia. Since 2000, more than 400 children have been abandoned in the hatches, with faith groups and right-wing politicians spearheading the revival in the controversial practice.”
Don’t hold your breath for liberal European government officials to tell us what percentage of these babies are White and what percentage are mixed-race or of Third World ancestry.
Guardian “[The boxes’] proponents draw on the language of the pro-life lobby and claim the baby boxes protect a child’s right to life and have saved hundreds of newborns. There are differing opinions on this key social issue across Europe. In France and Holland women have the right to remain anonymous to their babies after giving birth, while in the UK it remains a crime to secretly abandon a child. However UN officials argue that baby hatches violate key parts of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) which says children must be able to identify their parents and even if separated from them the state has a duty to respect the child’s right to maintain personal relations with his or her parent.”
Maybe if our society didn’t encourage women to be promiscuous and men to be irresponsible, we would not have a growing problem like this. It’s true that women have given babies up for adoption throughout history, but the new express anonymous abandonment policy is a sad reminder of how degenerate and irresponsible our society has become.
by Jeff Davis
Black-White relationships are just plain dangerous for the White women involved, no matter on what socio-economic level. Dating a Black man is a good way to end up dead.
The Huffington Post reports: “A body found in thick brush Friday morning is believed to be that of a special forces soldier-turned-trauma surgeon who was the subject of a nationwide manhunt after the killing of his ex-girlfriend at a hospital, police said. Authorities had been searching for 49-year-old Dr. Timothy Jorden since Wednesday morning, when 33-year-old Jacqueline Wisniewski was found shot to death in a stairwell at the Erie County Medical Center.”
“The body was found Friday not far from Jorden’s suburban home near Lake Erie. Police said it was clad in hospital scrubs. Dennis Richards, Buffalo Police Department chief of detectives, said the man apparently died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. An autopsy was being conducted. ‘It doesn’t make any sense that he did that, and that he killed himself, oh my god, it’s just terrible,’ said neighbor June Dupree. ‘I can’t get over it. I’m just about in tears right now.’”
Of course, the crucial causative factor of race is not mentioned anywhere in this article; only the photographs give it away. I’m surprised in a way that any current media would publish them. Usually liberal news media outlets move heaven and earth to avoid giving out details of a Black-on-White murder.
The article goes on: “SWAT teams had spent hours Wednesday searching the home without success.”
“[A neighbor] had told police he heard a single gunshot from the steep, thick terrain behind Jorden’s house on Wednesday morning, about 90 minutes after Wisniewski was gunned down at the hospital where she and Jorden worked.”
“Some of her friends told local media outlets that Jorden stalked her after she ended the relationship. One of her friends told WIVB-TV that Wisniewski told her the doctor had put a GPS tracking device in her car and once held her captive in her home for a day and a half, wielding a knife.”
And this previous incident didn’t suggest to her that it might be a good idea to call the cops or flee the area? It seems like this woman was all about bad decisions: Marrying the Negro in the first place, and then staying in the same city as he started to go psycho on her.
The article notes “Jorden’s colleagues told local media outlets that he had been acting strangely in recent months and lost as much as 75 pounds from his 6-foot-2, 250-pound frame.”
Perhaps they should test his body for Meth or other dangerous drugs associated with weight loss. Bear in mind this quota-hire was working as a surgeon. Can you say “ObamaCare”?
Speaking of interracial murders, we just passed the 18th anniversary of the murders of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman on June 12, 1994. The story of OJ and Nicole Simpson played out on the evening news, starting with the murder, OJ’s low-speed chase on the freeways of L.A. and then the “not guilty” verdict by a mostly Black jury. OJ Simpson had all sorts of advertising deals and a sports announcer job. But he could not get over the break up of his relationship with his pretty White wife. Instead of just finding a new football groupie to replace her, his animalistic rage built up until he lost all control and killed her and an innocent bystander, Ron Goldman.
The Jewish Supremacist-created “banking crisis” and their “open doors” immigration policy for America only, has so impoverished the U.S. that one in four children are now on food stamps according to 2011 data from the United States Department of Agriculture and U.S. Census Bureau.
The continuing downturn in the American economy is the direct result of Jewish Supremacist control of the economic and social policies of America, which are aimed at undermining and destroying the founding European American population.
Jewish Supremacist predator banks such as the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs and other notable institutions, such as Ameriquest (under now deceased Jewish Supremacist Roland E. Arnall), started the subprime mortgage disaster which led to the “banking crisis.”
This “banking crisis” was “solved” when the Jewish Supremacists used their political clout to extract billions of dollars in subsidies from their fellow tribesmen in control of the Federal Reserve. This in turn has inflicted decades of tax debt burden upon ordinary Americans and destroyed much of the U.S. economy.
As a result, the numbers of people receiving food stamp aid has risen by an astonishing 15.5 million recipients since 2009.
In total, some 19.9 million children benefited from the food supplement out of a population of 73.9 million Americans under the age of 18, the Census Bureau estimated.
A total of 47.5 million people are enrolled in the program or 1 out of every 6.5 Americans, according to enrolment data released for October 2011. Children constituted 45 percent of total participation.
That number is stark contrast to the data from 1970, when one out of every 50 Americans benefited from the supplement.
In addition to this financial crisis, the “open doors” immigration policy pushed by these same Jewish Supremacists –for America only, not Israel, where a strictly Jews-only policy is endorsed and applauded—has led to the wholesale importation of much of the poverty from Mexico and other Central American countries. All that has been done to destroy the traditional European American founding population base of America, to prevent them from becoming a problem for the Jewish Supremacists.
by Jeff Davis
All the know-it-all individuals, who blithely dismissed the candidacy of Ron Paul and accepted the Jewish media’s smear job against him, need to think again. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham is collaborating with the Obama regime to bypass the Constitution.
An article from Mother Jones magazine reports: “Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is not happy that the government might have to actually convict a suspected terrorist of a crime before locking them up forever and throwing away the key. So he’s working on an amendment to the pending defense bill that would make it clear that if the government thinks you’re a terrorist, it can put you in prison without ever having to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you so much as vandalized a dive bar bathroom wall.”
“The text of the amendment, which is circulating on the Hill but has not yet been formally introduced, would affirm the government’s power to ‘detain under the law of war’ any individual ‘who joins al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or an associated force’ and ‘plans or participates in a belligerent act against the United States on behalf of such forces anywhere within the United States and its territories.’”
“In other words, you could be deprived of your freedom in a war with no definable end, based on the mere suspicion that you’ve committed a crime. During the debate over last year’s defense bill, Congress agreed to leave open the question of whether or not military detention authority applied to US citizens apprehended on American soil. This amendment would ensure that it does.”
“The amendment is a response to the one proposed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) that would prevent the government from detaining Americans and legal permanent residents suspected of terrorism without charge or trial. That amendment wouldn’t protect all non-citizens apprehended on US soil however, so civil liberties and human rights groups are opposing it as unconstitutional. ‘any approach to dealing with indefinite detention should be consistent with basic constitutional principles, which say that all persons are guaranteed due process’ Human Rights First’s Raha Wala said in a statement emailed to reporters.”
“Instead, these groups are backing amendments from Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) that would ensure that any person—citizen or otherwise—apprehended on US soil could not be deprived of their freedom without due process of law. You know, like it says in the Constitution.”
The what? Oh, yes, the Constitution that Barack Obama ignores and defies at will, like when he implemented the Dream Act by imperial decree after Congress rejected it twice.
Of course, our politicians assure us that they will only use these harsh policies against al Qaeda, but how long until they target a militia member or survivalist or Tea Party member with these indefinite detentions? Sooner or later the Democrats and/or neocons will label these groups as “terrorists”.
Americans had a chance to elect Ron Paul in 2012, but they let the Jewish media convince them to support the badly flawed Mitt Romney. Add to that massive vote fraud in the primary and general election and the worst president since Jimmy Carter was just reelected by a wide margin.
If Ron Paul were elected, we could have moved back a couple steps from a New World Order tyranny. Let’s hope the next time a real patriot is running for president, we don’t let a crooked system and the lying Jewish media convince us to vote for the System candidates again.
The violently abusive term “shiksa,” which is Yiddish for a gentile woman, is used and heard commonly in Jewish writings on and off the internet (for example, see this recent article in the Jewish “Times of Israel” article “Shas versus Shiksa”)–and Jewish claims that it is “harmless” have been exposed as more lies.
In an article published on the Israeli Ynet News service, titled “Woman verbally abused by haredi bus passengers” it is revealed that ultra-Orthodox Jews “verbally abused” a Jewish woman who refused to sit in the back of a bus in Jerusalem.
According to the article, the orthodos Jews called the woman “shiksa” and “made vomiting sounds” as she boarded the bus. The woman, a 22 year old named Miri Bleicher, has dyed dark blond hair.
“The bus arrived but the driver didn’t open the front door, it then pulled away and stopped. I chased after it, it pulled away again and then stopped, until the driver eventually opened the door,” she was quoted as saying.
“At this point, she realized that the men were expecting her to sit in the back where all of the women were sitting. She refused to enter through the backdoor and bravely walked past the men who mumbled hateful slurs at her, including ‘shiksa,’” the article continued.
Now note the description of the word “shiksa” in that Ynet news article: it is clearly stated this this word is “hateful” and a “slur.”
In fact, according to the Mirriam Webster dictionary, the official definition of a “shiksa” is as follows: “1: often disparaging : a non-Jewish girl or woman; feminine of sheygets non-Jewish boy, from Hebrew sheqes? blemish, abomination.”
According to the soc.culture.jewish FAQ, “shiksa” and “shaygetz” are “the Yiddish derivative of the respective feminine and masculine Hebrew words for something unclean, dirty.”
The description continues: “The appellations are customarily applied to gentiles who do things inimical to Jewish interests, such as vandalizing Jewish buildings, robbing Jewish kids of their lunch money, or becoming romantically involved with Jews.
“The root is “sheketz”, which refers to house rodents and lizards. They impart ritual impurity, and therefore the term lends itself to the same kind of idea.”
Now note the difference in Jewish Supremacist attitudes towards these words: they are often used to describe non-Jewish females (and males) and when it is done by Jews to refer to non-Jews, then it is perfectly acceptable and no-one raises an eyebrow.
When however, orthodox Jews do it to another Jew, then it is worthy of news articles and descriptions of how “hateful” it is.
This provides yet another insight into the burning, eternal and unquenchable hatred which Jewish Supremacists have for all gentiles, and provides a window into the hateful mind of Jewish Supremacy.
by Jeff Davis
The city of Detroit was once the center of the US auto industry. Today, only the ruins of auto factories and offices remain. Detroit had two million people just a few decades ago, but there was a cancer brewing in Detroit. In the 1920s, many car companies hired Blacks out of the US South, bringing hundreds of thousands of them to Detroit. There’s one little problem with that. A large Black population always brings with it a plague of Black crime.
White people did not flee their homes in Detroit simply because they don’t like other races. White people were DRIVEN out of their homes and neighborhoods. A large percentage of Black crime should be classified as “hate crimes” against White people. Blacks frequently seek out any White people for beatings. Black men target White women and girls for rapes, and Black youths often mug White people who are out after dark. It was this tidal wave of Black crime that caused the population of Detroit to fall from two million to 707,000. Detroit is 84 percent Black today. Virtually the entire White population was driven out. If the Iraqi Shiites drove the Kurds out of Iraq in a similar campaign of violence, it would be called “genocidal warfare”.
The Blacks in Detroit were not content with committing countless crimes against their White neighbors. They eventually decided to burn the city down. One source notes “…in the early 1970s, the vandalism escalated to more devastating acts, such as arson. This primarily took place in the inner city, but surrounding suburbs were often affected as well. The crimes became more destructive in Detroit’s inner-city neighborhoods, and included hundreds of acts of arson and vandalism every year. The destruction reached a peak in the mid- to late-1980s, with more than 800 fires set in 1984, and 500 to 800 fires in the three days and nights before Halloween in a typical year.”
As recently as 1994, Devil’s night was still going strong. One news article dated Nov. 1st, 1994 notes “Hundreds of fires were set in the city and suburbs on Sunday despite official efforts to discourage young people from the arson that has become associated here with Devil’s Night, the night before Halloween.”
“A 1-year-old girl died in a fire in a suburb, although the authorities were uncertain if the blaze was related to Devil’s Night. At least 314 teen-agers were arrested for violating a curfew intended to prevent Devil’s Night unruliness, officials said today.”
The number of Devil’s Night arsons has fallen in recent years, but some would argue that the Blacks have simply burnt down all the vacated factories and office buildings (plus a few not-so-vacant buildings). There are grassy fields in parts of Detroit today, where buildings once stood.
Given all that, it’s not surprising that politicians are seriously talking about dissolving Detroit. An article from CBS reports: “It would no doubt be controversial, but the idea of dissolving the fiscally struggling city of Detroit and absorbing it into Wayne County is being tossed around in Lansing… Lansing Bureau Chief Tim Skubick reports some state Republicans are talking about giving the city the option to vote itself into bankruptcy. And mid-Michigan Senator Rick Jones said all options should be considered — including dissolving the city.”
“’If we have to, that is one idea we have to look at. We really have to look at everything that is on the table,’ Jones said. “Again, if this goes to federal bankruptcy, every employee down there will suffer, the city will suffer and the vultures will come in and take the jewels of Detroit and they will be gone.”
Aside from concrete rubble and steel, that might be salvaged from the literal ruins of Detriot, I can’t think of anything of value left in Detroit. In fact, many buildings have already been demolished and bulldozed after the natives set them on fire multiple times.
The article continues “Local consultant Tom Watkins has proposed this in the past, but the idea has never played well among Detroiters. In a live interview on WWJ Newsradio 950 Wednesday morning, Gov. Rick Snyder said he wouldn’t count anything out.”
“’Detroit needs to solve their problems, but they need support and we’ve been very supportive partners, I believe, in terms of offering different ideas and thoughts. And I just encourage them to work harder about working better together,’ Snyder said.”
In other words, please, get your act together and don’t embarrass liberalism by being the first Black-run city to completely collapse. Of course, they won’t change. They can’t. They’re not biologically or genetically capable of it.
Note that dissolving the city and placing it into some kind of receivership, creating a kind of federally-run disaster area is merely being considered right now. They don’t have the guts to do it yet and the increasingly bankrupt federal government may not have the money either. Other cities like Camden, Newark and Atlanta are following in Detroit’s footsteps so some sort of procedure to deal with completely bankrupt Black-run cities will inevitably be necessary.
by Jeff Davis
Another of the many long-term goals of the anti-White agenda is to set the parameters of “acceptable discussion” so that any criticism at all of the bandit state of Israel constitutes “anti-Semitism.” According to the ultra-liberal Salon.com “The U.S. Department of Education is investigating a [Jewish] faculty member’s complaint that a series of pro-Palestinian events at a California university crossed the line into anti-Semitism and created a hostile environment for Jewish students.”
Ah, there’s that favorite catch-all phrase of the Politically Correct establishment, “creating a hostile environment.” What, exactly, does that mean? Any damned thing they want it to mean!! Some of the more militant liberals and Jews don’t want their co-workers saying one thing that they disapprove of –effectively taking away free speech from millions of Americans while they’re at their workplace, earning the money to pay the taxes for a federal government, which is supposed to protect our free speech. I have NEVER heard of a conservative running to the boss to complain about liberals yapping amongst themselves, but liberals complain to the boss all the time about right-wing conversations at work; that’s just the sort of whiny, pathetic individuals that they are, and the Jews of course are the champion complainers if you make the mistake of saying almost anything in earshot of one of the Hebraic commissars.
The Salon article goes on: “The department’s Office for Civil Rights notified the University of California, Santa Cruz last week that it planned to look into allegations made by Hebrew lecturer Tammi Rossman-Benjamin dating back to 2001…Rossman-Benjamin said administrators repeatedly failed to address concerns voiced by her and several students [how dare they ignore us Jewish cranks?] about academic departments and residential colleges at Santa Cruz sponsoring “viciously anti-Israel” speakers and film screenings with campus funds. She also alleged that some professors have used their classes to promote an anti-Israel political agenda and failed to intervene or joined in when students were verbally attacked for defending the Jewish state.”
Ah, there we have the nub of it. These allegedly “anti-Semitic” faculty members failed to bend the knee and display proper toadying subservience to the Jewish state.
Imagine for a second that some people of German descent objected to the monstrous slander against their people, known as the “Holocaust”. For 66 years, this highly defamatory piece of war propaganda has been taught as fact with no opportunity for critics to point out its many flaws. The Holocaust has been used to smear Germans and justify the extortion of billions of dollars in “reparations” for Jews and the state of Israel in a swindle that rivals the Ponzi scheme by Bernie Madoff.
The article notes ” ‘The impact of the academic and university-sponsored Israel-bashing on students has been enormous,’ she said. There are students who have felt emotionally and intellectually harassed and intimidated, to the point they are reluctant or afraid to express a view that is not anti-Israel.’ Campus counsel Carole Rossi said the university will cooperate with the federal investigation.”
I can tell they’re just thrilled at the prospect of the Feds doing a witch-hunt for anti-Semites —which now apparently includes any criticism of the murderous bandit state of Israel, which recently added “selling human organs stolen from Palestinians” to their long list of crimes against humanity.
Another key point in the anti-White agenda is that the Jews want “hurting their feelings” to be made a criminal offense under which anyone who doesn’t seem to hold them in adoring reverence can be punished and eventually imprisoned by law. This situation currently exists in much of Europe and Canada.
All I can say is: Keep it up, Jews, keep it up. Eventually even your Gentile liberal allies will find it so hard to put up with your arrogant demands that they will start dumping you like everyone else, who came in contact with your tribe, has done down through four thousand years of history.
by Jeff Davis
The Democrats seem more prone to let all that anti-White hatred hang out now that Barack Obama has been “re-elected” through massive vote fraud in at least ten states.
An article from TheCollegeFix.com reports: “A political science professor at Butler University asks students to disregard their ‘American-ness, maleness, whiteness, heterosexuality, middle-class status’ when writing and speaking in the classroom – a practice the school’s arts and sciences dean defended as a way to negate students’ inherent prejudices.The syllabus of the course at Butler, a small Midwestern liberal arts institution in Indianapolis, spells out that students should use ‘inclusive language’ because it’s ‘a fundamental issue of social justice.’”
“’Language that is truly inclusive affirms sexuality, racial and ethnic backgrounds, stages of maturity, and degrees of limiting conditions,’ the syllabus states…”
“The syllabus of the class, called Political Science 201: Research and Analysis, goes on to ask students to write and speak in a way that does not assume American-ness, maleness, whiteness, heterosexuality, middle-class status, etc. to be the norm. It is taught by a black, female professor.”
I wonder if this Black liberal professor also wants respect for Christians, gun owners, smokers, meat eaters and people with traditional values, or does she blithely dismiss all these people as “haters” whose opinions are not relevant… according to people like her.
The article goes on: “In an interview with The College Fix, Jay Howard, dean of Butler’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, denied this practice essentially presumes every student who walks through the door is a racist or misogynist.”
“He said students must be told not to assume such prejudices because such assumptions are ingrained into the culture and remain there until questioned. With that, a liberal arts education questions these assumptions, and such questions can make for uncomfortable situations, he said…”
Imagine how uncomfortable it will be in this Black female professor’s class for any White girls, who feel they should only date White men. Will they be ridiculed and “shamed” for wanting a White husband just like thousands of generations before them? What if one of these White girls speaks the truth and says that White men are more intelligent and more reliable than Black men? Or that they don’t want freakish looking mulatto offspring that will make them a pariah in the White world?
Imagine how uncomfortable a White male Christian would be in her class if he says that his religious beliefs (and basic instincts) tell him that homosexuality is wrong. Does the female professor (who could easily be a lesbian herself) give these young White men an “F” for not conforming to her view of the world, which she clearly thinks is more important than their religious beliefs.
From now on, in Obama’s Third World America, your skin color and your gender will criminalize you and make you a third class citizen, who is last in line for college admission, jobs and promotions even if you are the most brilliant person in line.
The article didn’t mention the name of the Black female professor probably to protect her, but the Dean of the Liberal Arts and Sciences Department at Butler University is Dr. Jay Howard and you can send your complaints for him here.
Obama’s Legalese for Babies the State Wanted Dead
by Charles Coughlin
Perhaps the greatest omen of how someone will rule can be found in how they treat the most vulnerable in society. The Zionist media has covered up a multitude of sins regarding Barack Obama to preserve his “nice guy” image that millions of Americans have completely bought into. Well, how would these Americans regard Mr. Obama if they knew that he once referred to a baby, who was alive outside the womb, as only “temporarily alive” or as a “pre-viable fetus”?
An article from HumanEvents.com reports “The Obama-O’Malley debate was a defining moment for Obama because it dealt with such a fundamental issue: The state’s duty to protect the civil rights of the young and disabled… Eight years ago, nurse Jill Stanek went public about the ‘induced-labor abortions’ performed at the Illinois hospital where she worked. Often done on Down syndrome babies, the procedure involved medicating the mother to cause premature labor. Babies who survived this, Stanek testified in the U.S. Congress, were brought to a soiled linen room and left alone to die without care or comforting. Then-Illinois state Sen. Patrick O’Malley, whom I interviewed this week, contacted the state attorney general’s office to see whether existing laws protected a newborn abortion-survivor’s rights as a U.S. citizen. He was told they did not. So, O’Malley — a lawyer, veteran lawmaker and colleague of Obama on the Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee — drafted legislation…. ‘This legislation was about preventing conduct that allowed infanticide to take place in the state of Illinois,’ O’Malley told me… The Judiciary Committee approved the bills with Obama in opposition. On March 31, 2001, they came up on the Illinois senate floor. Only one member spoke against them: Obama. ‘Nobody else said anything,’ O’Malley recalls. The official transcript validates this. ‘Sen. O’Malley,’ Obama said near the beginning of the discussion, ‘the testimony during the committee indicated that one of the key concerns was — is that there was a method of abortion, an induced abortion, where the — the fetus or child, as — as some might describe it, is still temporarily alive outside the womb.’ Obama made three crucial concessions here: the legislation was about 1) a human being, who was 2) ‘alive’ and 3) ‘outside the womb.’ …Obama came up with yet another term to describe the human being who would be protected by O’Malley’s bills. The abortion survivor became a ‘pre-viable fetus.’ ”
No other Democrat in the Ilinois legislature was so determined to protect “infanticide” besides Mr. Obama. Perhaps Barack knew that as an African-American he had a certain amount of immunity from criticism, and the Zionist media has repeatedly bent over backwards to ignore political statements by Obama that would easily end the career of a White politician, who came out supporting such horrors as partial birth abortion or literally finishing off babies, who stubbornly clung to life “outside the womb” while they were “temporarily alive.”
If the mainstream media had reported this particular story openly and honestly well before election day in 2008, it seems absolutely certain that Obama would have lost the election. Obama got close to half of the Catholic vote because there was widespread ignorance of his ghoulish support of partial birth abortion and infanticide. The Zionist media carefully crafted an image of Obama as a religious church-going family man. They carefully censored any stories about him allying himself with the most radical pro-abortion extremists, who apparently think abortion can continue even outside the womb.
Then again, the Zionist media initially failed to tell us that his “church-going” involved a militant “hate-Whitey” preacher, Reverend Wright. Conservative talk radio broke that story and the Zionist media only reluctantly reported on it. The Ziomedia never told us that Obama’s mother was a militant atheist and extreme leftist snob. The Ziomedia never mentioned that Obama’s parents met in a Russian language class in 1960 and that his parents were likely in that class because both of them were sympathetic to Communism.
I would expect someone raised by an atheist or closet Communist to have little respect for human life. Unfortunately, the Ziomedia continues to tell us how “wonderful” it is Obama was reelected. One gets the impression that all Blacks must look alike to the Ziomedia; otherwise they would not have been such cheerleaders for a closet Marxist who would refer to a defenseless newborn baby as a “temporarily alive… pre-viable fetus.”
by Jeff Davis
Recently a Hungarian MP said something the Jews didn’t like. The following is from the London Financial Times and is a good example of the standard boiler-plate response to anyone who ruffles Zionist feathers.
The Financial Times reports: “A call by a far-right Hungarian MP for a list to be drawn up of Jewish politicians and government members who pose a threat to national security has caused outrage among both Hungary’s estimated 80,000-strong Jewish community and liberal politicians.”
These articles always lead with how “outrageous” it is that anyone should say anything critical of Jews or Israel. The fact of the matter is that when it comes to the national security for a Gentile nation, you can’t trust Jews. Jews have been infamous for spying from Judas to the A-bomb spies, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, to the worst spy in modern American history, Jonathan Pollard. Adding to the problem are the dual-citizen Israelis, who have only the most paper-thin claim to be citizens of the US or Hungary or any Gentile nation. They could steal a billion dollars in secrets, flee to Israel and never be extradited.
The article notes “Marton Gyongyosi, a leading MP of Jobbik, Hungary’s radical rightwing party, called for the list in the Budapest parliament on Monday, saying that it was justified by the increased tensions following the latest conflict between Gaza and Israel. ‘Jobbik MPs have made anti-Semitic and anti-Roma statements in parliament before, but nobody has ever called for a list. This is totally unacceptable in a democracy,’ Timea Szabo, an MP for the liberal-green LMP party and deputy chairperson of parliament’s human rights committee, said.”
“’I am a Holocaust survivor,’ Gusztav Zoltai, executive director of the Hungarian Jewish Congregations’ Association, told Reuters. ‘For people such as me this generates raw fear, even though it is clear that this only serves political ends. This is the shame of Europe, the shame of the world.’ Up to 600,000 Jews from Hungarian territories died in the Holocaust, the majority after mass deportations began in the last year of the war.”
I wonder what the Jews would do without the Holocaust. It’s their excuse for everything and sometimes a “get out of jail free card”. Anyone, who looks into the Holocaust seriously, will quickly discover a multitude of problems with it, a few of which can be found here.
Meanwhile, some politicians around the world are finally showing some backbone and standing up to the Zionists. Zionists have only one loyalty: to their people and their supremacist goals. When it comes to Gentiles, we are merely slaves, who work to enrich them and who are sent off to fight wars for Israel.
by Jeff Davis
We might as well just stop looking at the American mainstream news media for any reporting of Black hate crimes against Whites. It simply never makes the cut. Once again, we had to find out about these stories from the U.K. Daily Mail.
An article in the Daily Mail reports: “Police in the US have arrested two [Black] teenagers in connection with the murder of a [White] Domino’s Pizza worker who was stabbed 50 times and bludgeoned as she delivered an order to them. The stabbing took place on Thursday evening as the victim, 27-year-old [White] mother-of-one Elizabeth Hutcheson, was delivering pizza to an address in the small city of Cedartown in Georgia.”
“Cadedra Cook, 18, who lived at the house, and a 15-year-old boy whose name police are not releasing, are in custody in Polk County Jail on murder charges.”
“Police said a pizza order was placed by telephone at Domino’s shortly before 9 pm on Thursday and Ms Hutcheson was the delivery person sent. Ms Hutcheson was found bleeding in the doorway of the house at around 9.15pm by police officers conducting a traffic stop nearby who rushed to the scene when they heard her screams. She was pronounced dead at Polk Medical Center. Police said both attackers fled on foot after the stabbing, and after a search overnight involving many different police teams, officers apprehended the teenagers at around noon yesterday in a nearby field.”
“Newsome told the Cedartown Standard investigators were looking for a motive for the killing.”
You don’t need a motive for garden variety Blacks to attack White people. Maybe the Blacks were upset that the pizza delivery woman expected them to pay. After all, they are entitled. Obama is president. That’s how many Blacks think.
Another White woman has been murdered and is even being denied a mention on the evening news because liberal editors don’t want White people to notice a disturbing trend of Black-on-White violence. There have been a number of assaults, robberies and murders of pizza deliverymen and taxi cab drivers, who were told to go to Black neighborhoods. Maybe if the local evening news had reported these stories, Miss Hutcheson would not have taken this high-risk job, which might cause her child to lose her mother.
For the liberal mass media, it’s more important to censor news of Black crimes than to give White people critical crime information that we need to know so that we don’t wind up crime victims. Too bad the relatives of Miss Hutcheson can’t sue the liberal mainstream media for keeping her ignorant, an ignorance that has cost her life.
by Jeff Davis
The New York Post reports: “The privileged [Jewish] daughter of a prominent city doctor, and her boyfriend — a Harvard grad and Occupy Wall Street activist — have been busted for allegedly having a cache of weapons and a bomb-making explosive in their Greenwich Village apartment.”
“Morgan Gliedman — who is nine-months pregnant — and her baby daddy, Aaron Greene, 31, also had instructions on making bombs, including a stack of papers with a cover sheet titled, ‘The Terrorist Encyclopedia,’ sources told The Post yesterday. People who know Greene say his political views are ‘extreme,’ the sources said.”
This is all highly reminiscent of the left wing terrorists of the ’60s and ’70s, including Barack Obama’s dear friends, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. I’ve got a feeling Barack may have the Feds go easy on these latest spoiled brat bombers or maybe they’ll get a presidential pardon or commutation on Obama’s last day in office.
The article notes “Cops found the stash in the couple’s West Ninth Street home Saturday when they went there to look for Gliedman, 27, who was wanted for alleged credit-card theft. A detective discovered a plastic container with seven grams of a white chemical powder called HMTD, which is so powerful, cops evacuated several nearby buildings. Police also found a flare launcher, which is a commercial replica of a grenade launcher; a modified 12 gauge Mossberg 500 shotgun; ammo; and nine high-capacity rifle magazines, the sources said. Cops also allegedly uncovered papers about creating homemade booby traps, improvised submachine guns, and various handwritten notebooks containing chemical formulas.”
“The couple’s arrest Saturday was a sharp turn from their privileged backgrounds. Gliedman, who grew up on Park Avenue, graduated from Dalton in 2002. Her dad, Dr. Paul Gliedman, is director of radiation oncology at Beth Israel Hospital, Brooklyn Division.”
“Paul Gliedman — who was included in New York magazine’s list of top doctors in 2011 — received his medical degree from Columbia University. Morgan’s mother, Susyn Schops Gliedman, is a realtor with Prudential Douglas Elliman. Greene attended Harvard as an undergraduate and did his graduate work at the university’s Kennedy School of Government. He has five prior run-ins with the police, with the charges including, assault, and weapons possession, sources said.”
Elections have consequences, the US just reelected an unqualified closet Communist, who still has yet to renounce his terrorist pal, Bill Ayers.(Of course, Ayers is believed to have ghost-written both of Barack Obama’s books, an act of fraud, which earned several million dollars for Obama, and fooled millions of White people into thinking Obama was an intellectual.
If it’s “OK” to elect and reelect to the presidency a radical communist, who associated with terrorists, then maybe far-left terrorist cells, like the one just mentioned, will start forming again. This is the most likely explanation for these rich New York brats and their bomb-making fetish, but don’t hold your breath for anyone in the “respectable” mass media to associate Obama and his pal, Bill Ayers, with inspiring this. The mainstream media is too busy trying to blame Rush Limbaugh for all the mass shootings, which keep happening in gun-free theaters or gun-free school zones.
by Jeff Davis
Obamacare is shaping up to be the precise disaster that all the doom-sayers said it would be. There are dozens of little stories like this popping up all over the country. An article on Breitbart reports: “Pennsylvania’s Community College of Allegheny County (CCAC) is slashing the hours of 400 adjunct instructors, support staff, and part-time instructors to dodge paying for Obamacare. ‘It’s kind of a double whammy for us because we are facing a legal requirement under the new law to get health care and if the college is reducing our hours, we don’t have the money to pay for it,’ said adjunct biology professor Adam Davis.”
“On Tuesday, CCAC employees were notified that Obamacare defines full-time employees as those working 30 hours or more per week and that on Dec. 31 temporary part-time employees will be cut back to 25 hours. The move will save an estimated $6 million.”
And those employees will lose five hours of work per week which could be devastating to many of them. Some people will be painfully tightening their belts while others may not be able to pay all their bills plus their mortgage. Not to mention the effect on education of class hours being cut.
The article continues “‘While it is of course the college’s preference to provide coverage to these positions, there simply are not funds available to do so,’ said CCAC spokesperson David Hoovler. ‘Several years of cuts or largely flat funding from our government supporters have led to significant cost reductions by CCAC, leaving little room to trim the college’s budget further.’ The solution, says United Steelworkers representative Jeff Cech, is that adjunct professors should unionize in an attempt to thwart schools seeking similar cost-savings efforts from avoiding Obamacare.”
Oh, yeah, that’s really what we need. So instead of the teachers losing hours, they go on strike in an attempt to extort more money out of the same government that is taking the money away by imposing ObamaCare. Great solution there. Unless, of course, the union can negotiate a waiver from ObamaCare through some secret deal to turn out the vote for the Democrats.
The whole premise of ObamaCare that everyone in America can reach deep into his pockets and buy health insurance or that every small business –and even college– can suffer this government mandate without dire consequences was obvious to pundits on the right or anyone with a reasonable understanding of basic economics, but Barack Obama is president, and that’s a huge problem all by itself.
by James Buchanan
Scientists have known for a long, long time that Blacks have smaller brains on average. If you can find a 1959 Encyclopedia Britannica, the section on races will mention that Whites have a larger average brain size than Blacks. The liberals and Jews apparently got this important racial information scrubbed out of most books published after 1959. About every ten years since 1960, some brave White academic will publish a book talking about these significant differences. Just off hand I remember the authors, Carleton Coon, Murray and Herrnstein and Arthur Jensen. The “Bell Curve” is perhaps the most famous of these racial reality books.
The latest data from J. Philippe Rushton states that Blacks have brains that are 80cc’s smaller on average. This data may be based on African-American Blacks, who tend to have about 25% White genes mixed in with IQs around 85. Their primitive all-Black cousins in west Africa have IQs down around 70 (with even smaller brains).
One source notes “The black-white gap is 15 points when measured on the Wechsler tests, 18 on the Stanford-Binet. Both tests are, of course, normed so as to produce an average of 100, but the white average is a bit higher. On the Wechsler metric, whites and blacks average 102 and 87, respectively. On both tests, the gap between the races is almost exactly 1 SD (standard deviation). The gap of 1 SD has been observed since the earliest days of intelligence testing.”
Liberals often respond with a flurry of hysterical gibberish and everything unscientific when confronted with solid scientific information about racial differences. Some liberals will even claim that there is no relationship between intelligence and brain size even though the history of evolution has been a steady march toward larger brain sizes and taller foreheads. The earliest hominids had brain sizes about the same as modern day apes.
According to J. Philippe Rushton, the White average brain size is about 1347cc’s and the Black average brain size is 1267cc’s. In contrast, the largest brain size recorded for an individual ape is 700cc’s. Another important difference is the shape of the brain. The Neanderthal for example had a slightly larger brain size than modern humans, but almost no forehead. The frontal region of the brain is where creativity resides.
Liberals respond to racial facts with emotional rhetoric. According to them, all the races are equal in mental ability regardless of differing test scores, genes or brain sizes. Never mind the fact that White men were walking on the moon forty years ago, while most natives in Africa were still squatting in mud huts. One famous Jewish propagandist Ashley Montagu could be called the king of egalitarian propaganda. If it weren’t for Jewish and liberal connections, he would have likely been a village idiot gibbering away crazy things on a street corner. He has consistently denied that the races are different in intelligence despite test scores that date back over generations that show a significant 15 percent IQ gap between Blacks and Whites.
East Asians reportedly have a brain size average 17cc’s bigger than the White average, but their societies tend to be less prosperous, mired in bureaucracy and corruption lacking the creativity found in White nations. Perhaps this lack of prosperity is tied to a lack of creativity which may be linked to the shape of the head. Asians typically have rounder heads. Asians seem to do best perfecting Western engineering. The small extra brain capacity of east Asians may give them better memories, but not creativity due to a different head shape.
It’s a bit unfair comparing east Asians (typically just the Japanese and Koreans) to the average of the whole White race. I suspect the Swedes -for example- might have a brain size average bigger than certain east Asian groups. You never hear anyone comparing Scandinavians to Asians, but you often hear of east Asians compared to Whites. Some of the data on Asians may be skewed in their favor –especially if Asian Americans are being used to represent their homelands. It could make a big difference if the east Asians are immigrants to the US, who might be a little smarter than the east Asians who didn’t have the initiative to leave their over-crowded homelands.
China has 1.3 billion people and it’s only started to do well as American companies outsourced manufacturing to them. I suspect if all the ordinary Chinese peasants were included as east Asians, the “east Asian” average brain size would be less than the White average.
The reluctance of most Americans to admit that the races are not equal results from decades of propaganda from politicians and the liberal media. Curiously, most people will admit that certain breeds of dogs have different personalities. The border collie is a workaholic. The Irish setter is a gentle dog. The German shepherd is a good watch dog, and the Chihuahua is a nervous shaky dog. Now if a simple animal like a dog can have a personality for each breed, then why is it that people won’t admit certain personalities are associated with certain races? Studies of identical twins, who were separated at birth, also suggest that a wide range of personality traits are rooted in our genes.
by Jeff Davis
After Obama’s reelection, we can expect to see the preferred minorities squabbling over the spoils, like buzzards rending and tearing America’s carcass apart. Some of this squabbling involves, who appoints which political hack to some position of power. What the minorities fail to consider is that all that political power will do them no good if the productive White people flee a Black-run city, district or state. Look at the city of Detroit. It had over two million people in the 1950s, but Black crime drove out the Whites and now it’s a nearly bankrupt ruin with only 707,000 people left in it.
An article from NJ.com reports: “A behind-the-scenes political maneuver by [Black] Newark Mayor Cory Booker to fill a vacant council seat with his choice led to a near-riot in city hall tonight, with dozens of residents rushing the council stage and police responding with pepper-spray. After weeks of jockeying for Rep. Donald Payne’s successor, Booker made an unprecedented personal appearance to cast the deciding vote with his council allies for Shanique Davis Speight, a longtime ally of power broker Stephen Adubato, over the angry objections of residents.”
“…But when Speight was escorted by police to be sworn in, a group of residents, led by SEIU Local 617 President Rahaman Muhammad, stormed the dais and appeared to lunge toward Speight and her grade-school-age son. Police restrained the group as they toppled a podium and residents were caught in the rush. When Muhammad would not give way, an officer doused him with pepper spray, along with residents, reporters and at least one other officer. ‘This truly was an out-of-body experience,’ said Sharif. “The mayor, who goes all around the country to talk about democracy… (was) literally in the back of the room, hiding in the shadows.’ In the confusion, Speight was ushered out of the council chamber and sworn in by City Clerk Robert Marasco.”
Well, the Democrats are not yet hacking each other up with machetes as might happen after a political dispute in Haiti or Africa, but it probably won’t be long before that happens.
Newark is a nearly 100 percent non-White city. The Whites fled a generation ago either to suburbs or out of the state. New Jersey is a major league basket case of long standing.
There seems to be an Hispanic faction which backs the present Black mayor against a radical Black faction as represented by the former Black Panther Barakas and all those other funny, quasi-African names.
The liberal agenda has locally achieved one of the main points in their Agenda: White people seem to have been removed from the political equation in a large part of New Jersey. The result is that Newark is a ghastly run-down slum subsisting on government handouts and dutifully delivering its votes to the Democratic party every election.
Never mind the fact that city after city in America is losing its White population and turning into another Detroit. Apparently that’s the future of America unless we do something to stop it.
by Jeff Davis
Apparently rule number one in the new liberal America is that we can’t criticize anyone who is Black, female or Democrat —and you’re in for a world of trouble if you criticize someone who is all three!
An article from USA Today reports: “President Obama hasn’t said whether he will nominate Susan Rice to be secretary of State, but the debate over her is already intense. Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., told CNN on Tuesday that some Republican claims that Rice is incompetent may be racial in nature.”
“’These are code words,’ Clyburn said, adding that ‘these kinds of terms that those of us — especially those of us who were born and raised in the South — we’ve been hearing these little words and phrases all of our lives and we get insulted by them.’”
Gee, you don’t suppose White people have been whispering “code words” about incompetency and Blacks because most Blacks in positions of authority, including Barack Obama, really are incompetent.
White people often have to use code words because there is no more freedom of speech and we can’t use words like “racial inferiority” since the truth is so taboo in America today.
The article continues “Rice, the current U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has been criticized by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other Republicans over comments she made following the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.”
It looks like we’re in for another four years of “Shut up you racists.”
We tried to get Obama voted out because he added six trillion dollars to the National Debt, got the US credit rating lowered twice, failed to punish Eric Holder for the Fast and Furious Scandal and because Obama let Americans die in the Benghazi scandal.
We were being non-racial in our arguments against Obama (who is indeed too incompetent for the US presidency), but the liberals, Blacks, Latinos and Jews voted based on race for Barack Obama. They wanted a Black man in the White House and their voting was purely anti-White “racism.”
By the way, why was it never “sexist” for the Democrats to smear Sarah Palin as an “airhead” in the 2008 presidential election? Palin had much more leadership experience than Obama. She probably has a higher IQ and higher SAT scores than Obama (who hides all his school records partly due to embarrassment), and Ms. Palin knows that there are only 50 states in the Union, unlike that Kenyan-born and raised-in-Indonesia Muslim, Barack Obama.
Funny how no one ever talks about how liberals are severely anti-White or sexist. Seems like the pot endlessly calls the kettle “black” and gets away with it.
by Jeff Davis
One of the dirty little secrets about ObamaCare is that it will actually result in lost medical jobs. The Orlando Sentinel reports: “In the largest staff reduction in its nearly 100-year history, Orlando Health is cutting up to 400 jobs starting immediately, hospital system officials announced Monday. The move is part of a broader effort to position the hospital system for the health-care overhaul, CEO Sherrie Sitarik said The elimination of jobs will occur in two phases and represents a 2 percent to 3 percent reduction in the system’s 16,000-person work force, said Orlando Health spokeswoman Kena Lewis. The cuts affect all departments and all eight of the system’s hospitals, including Orlando Regional Medical Center and Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, two of the system’s better-known facilities.”
“Although no staff nursing positions have been eliminated, the hospital has cut nursing management positions. Those workers may apply for lower-level nursing jobs.”
Somehow I doubt if this will work. Who will manage the nurses if the management is forced to become nurses? Whenever government gets involved with health care, the amount of paperwork tends to increase greatly, which means more office workers and administrators may need to be hired, not less.
The article continues “The first wave of employees affected received their notices Friday, Lewis said. The next wave of downsizing will occur after the first of the year. The non-profit health network also will reduce staffing through attrition. Another part of the system’s five-point cost restructuring includes eliminating ‘admirable but not sustainable’ programs, Lewis said. The hospital also will work to standardize certain health-care procedures.”
“’The hospital is cutting supply expenses by consolidating pharmaceutical purchases through one wholesaler and by renegotiating contracts for cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Those two measures combined will result in an annual savings of $825,000, Lewis said.’ The hospital will also delay capital spending, she said.”
The big crunch, of course, will come when all of a sudden the current number of existing physicians are forced to accept about 30 million new patients –many from the Third World with the added complication that many won’t speak English. Millions of these new patients will have pre-existing conditions which will require massive amounts of care. The strain on clinics, hospitals and private practices will be overwhelming. It is expected that large numbers of doctors and nurses will not want to continue working in the US. It will come as a shock when they find they can no longer make medical decisions without government bureaucrats and bean-counters looking over their shoulders. Some American doctors may set up practices in other countries to treat cancers and afflictions not covered by ObamaCare.
by Ian Mosley
The U. K. Daily mail reports: “Theresa May is being urged to reform a controversial law which bans ‘insulting words or behaviour’ amid mounting evidence that it is strangling free speech.”
“Campaigners say the Public Order Act is being abused by over-zealous police and prosecutors to arrest Christian street preachers, critics of Scientology, gay rights campaigners and even students making jokes.”
Although updated in 1986, the Public Order Act was originally passed in the U.K. in the 1930s effectively to ban Sir Oswald Mosley, the British Union of Fascists and the anti-war movement which was trying to prevent certain sinister forces from shoving England into another pointless war with Germany. Any law supposedly designed to outlaw rude or insulting language or “hate speech” is invariably used by the Jews to silence any patriots who don’t like their government being subverted by the Jews.
The article notes “Currently, Section 5 of the 1986 Act outlaws ‘insulting words or behaviour’, but what constitutes ‘insulting’ is unclear and has resulted in a string of controversial arrests. Human rights campaigners, MPs, faith groups and secular organisations have joined forces to have the ‘insulting words or behaviour’ phrase removed from the legislation, arguing that it restricts freedom of speech and penalises campaigners, protesters and even preachers.”
“Former shadow home secretary David Davis, a leading campaigner for civil liberties, said reform was vital to protecting freedom of expression in Britain today ‘There is a growing list of examples where the law against using insulting language has led to heavy-handed action by police and prosecutors. It is not only distressing for the individuals concerned, it constitutes a threat to Britain’s tradition of free speech,’ he said.”
If people in Parliament cared about Britain’s “tradition of free speech” laws like this wouldn’t exist at all. The truth is that people in England have never had a Right to Free speech, and that’s why the American revolutionaries created the Bill of Rights so that the United States would have this Right guaranteed in writing. The Bill of Rights was written in 1789 and put into law in 1791. The English government has had over 200 years to guarantee a similar Right of Free Speech for their people. What are they waiting for?
The article continues “‘Of course nobody likes to be insulted, particularly in public, but nor does anyone have a right not to be insulted. Freedom of speech includes the right to criticise, to ridicule and to offend. It is not the job of the police and the courts to prevent us from having our feelings hurt.”
Sounds suspiciously like common sense. The question should always be who defines what is “insulting” and is therefore forbidden? The answer is that the people with the power do, and so they can and do lock up whomever they want to. What has apparently happened is that a growing number of leftists and random journalists have become victims of this tyrannical law so there’s finally an effort to give the people of Britain the same Right that Americans have taken for granted since 1791.